Federal Jurisdiction

The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States
Average customer rating: 5 out of 5 stars
  • An excellent reference
  • Massive tome on the Supreme Court.
  • A worthy companion
  • A companion readers can't do without
  • An invaluable reference tool
The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States

Manufacturer: Oxford University Press, USA
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover

GeneralGeneral | Constitutional Law | Law | Subjects | Books
CourtsCourts | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Subjects | Books
Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Subjects | Books
GeneralGeneral | Law | Subjects | Books
Non-US Legal SystemsNon-US Legal Systems | Perspectives on Law | Law | Subjects | Books
ReferenceReference | Law Practice | Law | Subjects | Books
HistoryHistory | Encyclopedias | Reference | Subjects | Books
LegalLegal | Encyclopedias | Reference | Subjects | Books
Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
ReferenceReference | Law Practice | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
Look Inside Nonfiction BooksLook Inside Nonfiction Books | Trip | Specialty Stores | Books
Look Inside Reference BooksLook Inside Reference Books | Trip | Specialty Stores | Books
Qualifying Textbooks - Spring 2007Qualifying Textbooks - Spring 2007 | Stores | Books
Similar Items:
  1. The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions
  2. A People's History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our ConstitutionRevised Edition
  3. A History of the Supreme Court
  4. The Supreme Court
  5. America's Constitution: A Biography

ASIN: 0195176618

Book Description

The Supreme Court has continued to write constitutional history over the thirteen years since publication of the highly acclaimed first edition of The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court. Two new justices have joined the high court, more than 800 cases have been decided, and a good deal of new scholarship has appeared on many of the topics treated in the Companion. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist presided over the impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton, and the Court as a whole played a decisive and controversial role in the outcome of the 2000 presidential election. Under Rehnquists's leadership, a bare majority of the justices have rewritten significant areas of the law dealing with federalism, sovereign immunity, and the commerce power. This new edition includes new entries on key cases and fully updated treatment of crucial areas of constitutional law, such as abortion, freedom of religion, school desegregation, freedom of speech, voting rights, military tribunals, and the rights of the accused. These developments make the second edition of this accessible and authoritative guide essential for judges, lawyers, academics, journalists, and anyone interested in the impact of the Court's decisions on American society.

Customer Reviews:

5 out of 5 stars An excellent reference.......2006-06-03

It is difficult to say whether the contentious atmosphere that currently exists regarding the legal opinions of the Supreme Court is greater than any other time in the history of the United States. There have been times, especially during the Civil War and World War I when the Supreme Court raised the ire of many a citizen. Some of the "activist" justices, as some of them are now called, could perhaps be designated as "activist light" if compared with some of the justices of the past. This book gives ample evidence for this comparison, but also gives information on a wide variety of legal issues that the Supreme Court has had to deal with throughout its history. It would probably not be read from cover to cover, but instead serves as a general reference for those readers who are not and do not intend to become legal scholars, but are curious as to the reasoning patterns deployed by the justices who sat on the Court. Readers who are approaching this subject for the first time will find many surprises about the Court, both in the opinions expressed by the judges and in their personal histories and backgrounds. It is fair to say that legal opinions are guided predominantly by the historical context in which they are put forth, and this claim seems to gain more substantiation as more articles in this book are read and studied.

One of the more surprising things to learn from this book is that the Supreme Court never really considered free speech issues with the First Amendment until as late as 1919, in Schenck v. United States. This case is also discussed in this book, and revolves around Charles Schenck, who was general secretary of the Socialist party of the time. Schenck and a few other defendants were convicted with a violation of the 1917 Espionage Act by conspiring to obstruct military recruiting and enlistment via the circulation of pamphlet. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the unanimous opinion for the court ruling against Schenck and defendants and thus upholding their conviction. This case was the first time the famous statement of "crying fire in a public theatre" was used to restrict an "absolutist" interpretation of the First Amendment. It could also be viewed as an example of how even legal authorities, who are supposed to be calm and rational during emergencies or times of war, can succumb to the pressures of the times (in this case the pre- and post-war hysteria of World War I) and not be able to divorce themselves from their past personal histories (Holmes himself was wounded three times while serving in the Union Army during the Civil War). The Holmes Court effectively said that the First Amendment is not to be taken literally, and if speech presents a "clear and present danger" then governmental agencies have the right to punish the purveyors of this speech. Free speech issues dominant legal discussions at the present time, and the legal standing of "hate speech" is discussed in an article in this book. One can find solace in knowing that the Supreme Court has not found "hate speech" to be prohibited by the Constitution, despite attempts of many groups to justify its prohibition by appeals to constitutional law. The article on "hate speech" discusses some of these cases and gives a few references.

Without doubt the most despicable legal decision ever put forth by the Supreme Court was the case Scott v. Sandford in 1857. Known famously as the `Dred Scott Case', it is characterized in this book as one of the most important cases in American constitutional law. The decision essentially said that blacks are not citizens of the United States and therefore could not sue in federal courts. In addition, slaves were "property" that was "protected" by the Constitution. Naturally, and justifiably from a moral standpoint, the decision provoked hostile reaction against the Court, and the justices who ruled against Scott clearly were "activist heavy". In reference to the Dred Scott decision, the abolitionist William Garrison was justified in his statement that the Constitution was a "a covenant with death, and an agreement with hell."

The case Roe v. Wade is also discussed at length in this book, as expected. It will be interesting to see whether this case is overturned in the near future. If it is it might be because of a kind of `legal fatigue' that seems to be setting in dialog about the case. The arguments both for and against Roe v. Wade are repeated over and over again and have become almost platitudes. Rather than being a complicated Constitutional issue, is seems that the legal reasoning surrounding Roe v. Wade has become desiccated and has exhausted itself, offering no further insights or justifications for privacy.

5 out of 5 stars Massive tome on the Supreme Court........2005-10-07

_The Oxford Companion to the United States Supreme Court of the United States_ (Kermit Hall, ed.) is a massive tome containing a vast swath of information: cases, traditions, theories of constitutional interpretations, historical events, and biographies of all of the Supreme Court Justices. It has the same material (word for word) as Kermit Hall's _The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions_ but this is much more worthwhile reference work because it contains more contextual material than the cases themselves. This book is by no means exhaustive, but it provides a very informative overview of what the Supreme Court has been up to for the past two hundred years and the very different personalities serving on the body.

5 out of 5 stars A worthy companion.......2005-09-29

As the nation prepares to welcome the seventeenth Chief Justice, this book is a wonderful guide to the processes of the least 'media-exposed' branch of the federal government and its highest institution, the Supreme Court.

This book has many handy features for researchers and general enthusiasts. There are brief biographies - personal, professional and judicial - of each of the Chief Justices and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court (there have been 108 in all, with 113 appointments, as 5 Associate Justices have later been appointed as Chief Justice) together with pictures of each. There are synopses of over 400 of the most pivotal cases in the history of the Supreme Court (Marbury v. Madison, Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, even Bush v. Gore from the year 2000) - each of these cases is presented with voting record (who wrote the opinion, who concurred, who dissented, and who wrote additional opinions) as well as the pertinent issues in the cases and the implications of the decisions.

This is a very comprehensive guide. There are essays on key issues that are very thorough - for example, the essay on 'Federalism' is an eleven page entry that includes general political principles as well as court work. There are essays on each Article of the Constitution as well as each of the Amendments. One of the longest entries is the essay on 'History of the Court', subdivided into major chronological sections - this is one of the best, brief encapsulations of the history of the high court and how it is has made an impacted (and in turn been influenced by) society that I have read. There are also entries on the physical structures of the court - the essay on the building gives an historical overview of where and in what setting the court has met, and minor entries include features of the current building (for example, there is a short entry entitled 'Barber Shop', which talks about the facility for Justices and male employees of the court to get a haircut - it mentions nothing of where O'Connor, Ginsburg or the female court employees might get their hair done). One also learns that there is a basketball court in the gymnasium of the Supreme Court, but that basketball is prohibited while the court is in session, as the dribbling balls can be heard in the court chamber.

There are also entries on key judicial concepts. The concept of Constitutional Interpretation is something that many people take for granted, but is in fact an continually changing methodology. There are Common Law concepts such as the Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari (each have an entry) as well as the more structured Writ of Habeas Corpus. One also discovers here that 'Mootness' is a word.

There are several appendices that are also handy features. The first appendix, appropriately, is the full text of the Constitution. The second appendix lays out the nominations, terms and succession of the Justices in several ways, including an interesting graphical representation organised alongside presidential terms, as well another chronology that shows number of days without a full court appointed (when we imagine that a few months is a long time to go in the nomination and approval process, we can see that from 1843 to 1846, there were 965 days without a full court).

For trivia buffs, appendix three is a fun piece - there is a listing of the trivia and traditions of the court, divided into 'Firsts' and more general 'Trivia'. Too bad it doesn't list why Chief Justice Rehnquist wore stripes on his sleeves as Chief Justice! Perhaps that is an update for the third edition.

This is a book with great information, as well as a good deal of spirit and wit. It is a valuable addition to any library.

5 out of 5 stars A companion readers can't do without.......2005-08-16

Since its initial publication in 1992, The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States has served as a valuable resource on the history of the Court. With articles on the justices, their key decisions, legal philosophies, and even aspects of Court life, the Companion has been an indispensable addition for anyone interested in American law or the history of the Court.

With the passage of time, though, the need for an update taking into account subsequent cases and topics has only grown. This need has now been met with the second edition, which includes new articles on a variety of topics, and revision of many of the earlier ones. While a few mistakes were missed (the entry on Supreme Court clerks, for example, was not updated to include Stephen Breyer among the names of the justices who previously served as clerks) and while the bibliographies at the end of each article have only been indifferently updated (while the entry on William O. Douglas includes Bruce Allen Murphy's recent biography, the one on Benjamin Cardozo includes neither of the important books written about him over the past decade), the overall result is a work of continuing utility for readers and scholars alike.

5 out of 5 stars An invaluable reference tool.......2005-05-27

If you are a committed browser (as I am), you will find this hefty volume an invaluable reference tool. It's crammed with useful (and oftentimes fascinating) information about the Supreme Court, its judges, its procedures, its important cases, and its long and interesting history. The double-columned text and detailed index pack a truly amazing amount of data into 1239 pages. Want to know the issues and holdings in Presser v. Illinois (1886)? Interested in the Court's treatment of housing discrimination? Have you forgotten the factual details of John Marshall's seminal decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803)? Interested in the life and career of Justice Bushrod Washington, George Washington's favorite nephew and an associate justice of the Supreme Court from 1798 to 1829? (Why don't parents name their kids Bushrod any more?) All of these subjects, and hundreds more, are treated here with deftness and authority (the contributors include some of the leading constitutional scholars in the country). Read this and profit from the accumulated wisdom of many years and many great minds.
Federal Courts And The Law Of Federal-State Relations (University Casebook Series)
Average customer rating: Not rated
    Federal Courts And The Law Of Federal-State Relations (University Casebook Series)
    Peter W. Low , and John C., Jr. Jeffries
    Manufacturer: Foundation Press
    ProductGroup: Book
    Binding: Hardcover

    CourtsCourts | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Subjects | Books
    GeneralGeneral | Law | Subjects | Books
    CourtsCourts | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
    Look Inside Nonfiction BooksLook Inside Nonfiction Books | Trip | Specialty Stores | Books
    Qualifying Textbooks - Spring 2007Qualifying Textbooks - Spring 2007 | Stores | Books
    Similar Items:
    1. Low And Jeffries' Federal Courts And the Law of Federal-state Relations 2006: Supplement (University Casebook) (University Casebook)
    2. Federal Jurisdiction (Introduction to Law Series)
    3. Federal Courts and the Law of Federal-State relations 5th ed, 2005 Supplement
    4. Federal Courts (Gilbert Law Summaries)
    5. Wills, Trusts, and Estates

    ASIN: 1587785749

    Book Description

    This is a casebook that covers all the major aspects of federal courts and the law of federal-sate relations.
    Federal Jurisdiction in a Nutshell (Nutshell Series.)
    Average customer rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    • one helpful commercial outline
    Federal Jurisdiction in a Nutshell (Nutshell Series.)
    David P. Currie
    Manufacturer: West Publishing Company
    ProductGroup: Book
    Binding: Paperback

    Civil ProcedureCivil Procedure | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Subjects | Books
    Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Subjects | Books
    NutshellNutshell | Series | Law | Subjects | Books
    GeneralGeneral | Politics | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
    Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
    Look Inside Nonfiction BooksLook Inside Nonfiction Books | Trip | Specialty Stores | Books
    Similar Items:
    1. Federal Courts (Gilbert Law Summaries)
    2. Federal Jurisdiction (Introduction to Law Series)
    3. Black Letter Outline On Federal Courts (Black Letter Outlines)
    4. Law of Federal Courts (Hornbook Series)
    5. Judicial Process in a Nutshell (Nutshell Series)

    ASIN: 0314243526

    Book Description

    Federal courts are not allowed to intervene in a legal dispute indiscriminately. This authoritative text lays out the constitutional source of federal authority and the limits to its application, focusing on federal questions and diversity. Jurisdictional problems and jurisdictional amount are discussed, as well as admiralty, sovereign immunity, abstention, injunctions against suit, and civil rights removal. Also includes coverage of three-judge courts, trial location, and the law applicable in federal courts.

    Customer Reviews:

    4 out of 5 stars one helpful commercial outline.......2007-06-01

    I'm not a big commercial outline user--I only used them in two classes during law school--Civil Procedure (Examples and Explanations) and Federal Courts. My professor was an old U. Chi. grad, and had Currie for Federal Courts when he was in law school, so he liked this book and it tracked our class discussions pretty well. Currie's writing is clear, and TO THE POINT. That's one thing I liked best about this one. I would recommend it over Chemerinsky's Federal Jurisdiction, which I also looked at. Federal Jurisdiction has more detail (in terms of particular case discussion) but I didn't think it had much more substance (at least what law students need and can comprehend) than Currie's Nutshell. This is one I recommend.
    RANDOM HOUSE WEBSTERS COLLEGE (Genuine Burgundy Leather)
    Average customer rating: Not rated
      RANDOM HOUSE WEBSTERS COLLEGE (Genuine Burgundy Leather)
      Dictionary
      Manufacturer: Random House Reference
      ProductGroup: Book
      Binding: Hardcover

      Civil ProcedureCivil Procedure | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Subjects | Books
      Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Subjects | Books
      Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
      GeneralGeneral | Reference | Subjects | Books
      Look Inside Nonfiction BooksLook Inside Nonfiction Books | Trip | Specialty Stores | Books
      Look Inside Reference BooksLook Inside Reference Books | Trip | Specialty Stores | Books
      ASIN: 0679401202
      Release Date: 1992-01-28
      The Impeachment of George W. Bush: A Practical Guide for Concerned Citizens
      Average customer rating: Not rated
        The Impeachment of George W. Bush: A Practical Guide for Concerned Citizens
        Elizabeth Holtzman , and Cynthia L. Cooper
        Manufacturer: Nation Books
        ProductGroup: Book
        Binding: Paperback

        GeneralGeneral | Constitutional Law | Law | Subjects | Books
        Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Subjects | Books
        GeneralGeneral | Law | Subjects | Books
        GeneralGeneral | Politics | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
        GeneralGeneral | Social Sciences | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
        CultureCulture | Sociology | Social Sciences | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
        Executive BranchExecutive Branch | United States | Political Science | Social Sciences | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
        Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
        GeneralGeneral | Constitutional Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
        GeneralGeneral | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
        Look Inside Nonfiction BooksLook Inside Nonfiction Books | Trip | Specialty Stores | Books
        Similar Items:
        1. Articles of Impeachment Against George W. Bush
        2. The Case for Impeachment: The Legal Argument for Removing President George W. Bush from Office
        3. Impeach the President: The Case Against Bush And Cheney
        4. George W. Bush Versus the U.S. Constitution: The Downing Street Memos and Deception, Manipulation, Torture, Retribution, Coverups in the Iraq War and Illegal Domestic Spying
        5. United States V. George W. Bush et al.

        ASIN: 156025940X

        Book Description

        No one is better placed or qualified to call for the impeachment of George W. Bush than Elizabeth Holtzman. She is a former Congresswoman and Brooklyn District Attorney who was a vital member of the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment of President Richard Nixon.

        In The Impeachment of George W. Bush, Holtzman and her coauthor, acclaimed journalist Cynthia L. Cooper, have written a clear, lucid and damning legal brief that reveals that the 43rd President of the United States of America has committed high crimes and misdemeanors.

        This book focuses on four articles of impeachment: The Offense of Wiretapping Surveillance in Defiance of the Law; the Offence of Lying and Inducing America to Support a War; The Offense of Reckless Indifference to the Lives and Welfare of American Troops; The Offense of Torture in Violation of U.S. Laws and Treaties. It also provides an invaluable guide to how citizens can get involved in campaigning for impeachment, as well as an important historical analysis of impeachments past. The publication of this book is a summons to action in this process.
        The Bill : How Legislation Really Becomes Law: A Case Study of the National Service Bill
        Average customer rating: 3 out of 5 stars
        • Wake Me When It Is Over
        • Eh...bleh...
        • pretty good
        • Great insight into all that happens in Congress and why
        • Book like politics: fun, leaves empty space in stomach
        The Bill : How Legislation Really Becomes Law: A Case Study of the National Service Bill
        Stephen Waldman
        Manufacturer: Penguin (Non-Classics)
        ProductGroup: Book
        Binding: Paperback

        Management & LeadershipManagement & Leadership | Business & Investing | Subjects | Books | Business Ethics | Consolidation & Merger | Decision-Making & Problem Solving | Distribution & Warehouse Management | Industrial | Information Management | Leadership | Management | Management Science | Motivational | Negotiating | Operations Research | Planning & Forecasting | Pricing | Production & Operations | Project Management | Quality Control | Risk Assessment | Statistics | Strategy & Competition | Systems & Planning | Systems Analysis | Teams | Total Quality Management | Training
        Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Subjects | Books
        GeneralGeneral | Politics | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
        GeneralGeneral | College & University | Education | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
        Financial AidFinancial Aid | College & University | Education | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
        Federal GovernmentFederal Government | Government | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
        GeneralGeneral | Political Science | Social Sciences | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books
        Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
        Look Inside Business BooksLook Inside Business Books | Trip | Specialty Stores | Books
        Look Inside Nonfiction BooksLook Inside Nonfiction Books | Trip | Specialty Stores | Books
        Look Inside Reference BooksLook Inside Reference Books | Trip | Specialty Stores | Books
        Similar Items:
        1. American Public Policy: Promise and Performance
        2. The System: The American Way of Politics at the Breaking Point
        3. Computers, Ethics, and Society
        4. Business Research Methods
        5. The Enduring Debate: Classic and Contemporary Readings in American Politics, Fourth Edition

        ASIN: 0140233040

        Customer Reviews:

        2 out of 5 stars Wake Me When It Is Over.......2003-07-09

        I do not think I have ever taken this much time to read such a short book. At least it seamed to me that it took a long time. It was like walking up a never-ending hill. The only reason I kept plodding along is that I was interested in the overall outcome. What I am trying to say is that the book is dull. It is also that the subject is a bit on the non-sexy side so coupled with the authors "mathematics textbook" style of writing, it made a little book into something close to the Battan death march. Ok, I may be overstating it a bit, after all I did work my way through the book. The one good thing I can say is that the first half of the book was far better then the second half. How the author turned his already dull prose into something that was almost life threatening I will never know.

        With all this said there were some parts of the book that gave me some insight on how legislation works its way along the process. The part I thought was most interesting is all the groups that stick their hands into the bill. People with what appeared to me to have almost no or little effects from the bill got involved and tried to get their two cents in. Plus all the back handed and obstructionist activities made me wonder how anything gets done in Washington. Overall the book was dull, but did offer a tour of what it takes to get a bill passed. There has to be better books out there on the topic, I just do not know what they are.

        2 out of 5 stars Eh...bleh..........2002-10-28

        The story itself isn't a very interesting or informative one. The author tries to end chapters with a catchy phrase that is cynical/humorous/meaningful, but they rarely come off well. Journalistic style, if you like reading a 250 page news article, then you'll love it, but if you have a hard enough time getting through the lead of a front page article in the "New York Time," then don't bother.

        3 out of 5 stars pretty good.......1999-08-24

        Steven Waldman does an excellent job of explaining the substantive issues surrounding the national service bill and its corollary, student aid reform, and showing how conflicting ideals were reconciled or submerged. The detail gets a bit tedious in the last chapter, but the book does live up to its subtitle. Johnson & Broder's "The System," about the 1994 health care reform campaign, is a longer but more exciting book along the same lines.

        4 out of 5 stars Great insight into all that happens in Congress and why.......1999-04-19

        Great look at all the inside games that must take place for a bill to pass Congress. Who switches sides, who you can trust, who stabs whom in the back at the last moment. Any AmeriCorps member should read this to get a perspective of all that went into creating the program that you were a part of. Made me realize why things are the way they are in a program that has stived to do so much for our country and the young people in it.

        3 out of 5 stars Book like politics: fun, leaves empty space in stomach.......1998-06-15

        A well written book, exhaustive, sometimes boring. Lots of detail. Gives a very good look at politics, at how power, money, sinecure and ego all come together to get a bill passed. Shows that politics is 90% money and 10% intention. Lobbyists, senators and businessmen get together to divvy up the loot. Clinton is shown as a smart operator who attempts to play to the largest possible audience and still stay true to his beliefs/ethics/ideals.
        Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts
        Average customer rating: Not rated
          Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts
          Kate Stith , and Jose A. Cabranes
          Manufacturer: University Of Chicago Press
          ProductGroup: Book
          Binding: Hardcover

          CourtsCourts | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Subjects | Books
          GeneralGeneral | Criminal Law | Law | Subjects | Books
          Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Subjects | Books
          GeneralGeneral | Law | Subjects | Books
          Judicial SystemJudicial System | Perspectives on Law | Law | Subjects | Books
          Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
          GeneralGeneral | Criminal Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
          CourtsCourts | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
          Similar Items:
          1. How Do Judges Decide?: The Search for Fairness and Justice in Punishment (Key Questions for Criminal Justice)
          2. Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California (Studies in Crime and Public Policy X)
          3. Sentencing Matters (Studies in Crime and Public Policy)
          4. Biology and Crime
          5. The Mismeasure of Crime (Key Questions for Criminal Justice)

          ASIN: 0226774856

          Book Description

          For two centuries, federal judges exercised wide discretion in criminal sentencing. This changed in 1987, when a hopelessly complex bureaucratic apparatus was imposed on the federal courts. Though termed Sentencing "Guidelines," the new sentencing rules are mandatory. Reformers hoped that the Sentencing Guidelines would address inequities in sentencing. The Guidelines have failed to achieve this goal, according to Kate Stith and José Cabranes, and they have sacrificed comprehensibility and common sense.

          Fear of Judging is the first full-scale history, analysis, and critique of the new sentencing regime. The authors show that the present system has burdened the courts, dehumanized the sentencing process, and, by repressing judicial discretion, eroded the constitutional balance of powers. Eschewing ideological or politically oriented critiques of the Guidelines and offering alternatives to the current system, Stith and Cabranes defend a vision of justice that requires judges to perform what has traditionally been considered their central task--exercising judgment.


          Contempt of Court: The Turn Of-The-Century Lynching That Launched 100 Years of Federalism
          Average customer rating: 5 out of 5 stars
          • Fantastic book for law or history geeks!
          • Must Read
          • Excellent book
          • Scary moments of our past
          • Powerful history of the Law and Racisim
          Contempt of Court: The Turn Of-The-Century Lynching That Launched 100 Years of Federalism
          Mark Curriden , and Leroy Phillips
          Manufacturer: Faber & Faber
          ProductGroup: Book
          Binding: Hardcover

          GeneralGeneral | United States | Americas | History | Subjects | Books
          GeneralGeneral | State & Local | United States | Americas | History | Subjects | Books
          TennesseeTennessee | State & Local | United States | Americas | History | Subjects | Books
          HistoryHistory | African Americans | United States | Americas | History | Subjects | Books
          GeneralGeneral | Constitutional Law | Law | Subjects | Books
          CourtsCourts | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Subjects | Books
          GeneralGeneral | Criminal Law | Law | Subjects | Books
          Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Subjects | Books
          Legal HistoryLegal History | Perspectives on Law | Law | Subjects | Books
          Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
          Legal HistoryLegal History | Perspectives on Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
          CourtsCourts | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
          Look Inside History BooksLook Inside History Books | Trip | Specialty Stores | Books
          Similar Items:
          1. An Instance Of The Fingerpost
          2. May God Have Mercy: A True Story of Crime and Punishment
          3. Big Trouble: A Murder in a Small Western Town Sets Off a Struggle for the Soul of America
          4. Stories of Scottsboro
          5. Courtroom 302: A Year Behind the Scenes in an American Criminal Courthouse

          ASIN: 0571199526

          Amazon.com

          Prior to 1906, the U.S. Supreme Court had never tried a criminal case--and the high court had yet to assert its power over state criminal courts. That was all to change after the events of a cold January night earlier that year in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Blond, beautiful, 21-year-old Nevada Taylor had hopped on one of Chattanooga's new electric trolleys after work. Before she could reach home, the young woman was waylaid and raped by an unknown assailant. At first Taylor couldn't describe her attacker to town sheriff Joseph Shipp, as she hadn't seen the man clearly, but she soon became convinced he was "a Negro with a soft, kind voice." In just 17 days, a drifter dubbed a "Negro fiend" by the Chattanooga News had been hastily arrested, tried, convicted, and sentenced to hang.

          Two idealistic black lawyers intervened, filing appeals to the state and ultimately the U.S. Supreme Court, citing the numerous rights denied the most-likely innocent Ed Johnson. (One of the attorneys said of the suspect, "But for the will of God, that is me.") The high court agreed to hear the appeal, staying the Tennessee execution. But back in Chattanooga, the politically minded Sheriff Shipp looked the other way as a bloodthirsty crowd of hundreds broke Johnson out of jail, beat him brutally, and lynched him on the county bridge.

          Mark Curriden, a legal writer for the Dallas Morning News, and Leroy Phillips, a Chattanooga trial attorney, have painstakingly researched and vividly recounted the events of this oft-overlooked but significant episode in America's legal history, from the details of the original crime to the eventual federal conviction of Shipp and members of the lynch mob for contempt. A superb combination of journalistic storytelling and academic rigor. --Paul Hughes

          Book Description

          The case by which the U.S. Supreme Court declared itself the highest court in the land.

          When Ed Johnson, a black man, was wrongly convicted in 1906 of rape and sentenced to death in Tennessee, Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan issued a stay of execution, declaring that Johnson's right to a fair trial had been violated and that he had been railroaded through the criminal justice system. The interference of the Supreme Court was not well received back in Chattanooga. A violent mob answered this federal "interference" by dragging Johnson from his jail cell, beating him, and hanging him from a bridge. Local police did nothing to prevent the lynching, nor were any members of the mob arrested. For the first and only time in history, an enraged Supreme Court conducted a criminal trial to enforce its authority. It brought criminal contempt of court charges against the sheriff, his deputies, and members of the lynch mob.

          The first book written about these highly charged events, Contempt of Court raises issues of federalism versus states' rights that are as timely today as they were ninety years ago. Johnson's case led to a precedent-setting criminal trial that is unique in the annals of American jurisprudence. Mark Curriden and Leroy Phillips's riveting tale will prove essential reading for all interested in understanding how American justice works.

          Customer Reviews:

          5 out of 5 stars Fantastic book for law or history geeks!.......2007-03-08

          This is a terrific and rarely-told story from our nation's legal history. This well-written book will be fascinating to anyone who has an interest in the law, civil rights, our nation's history, or just in captivating stories.

          5 out of 5 stars Must Read.......2005-06-14

          For one interested in the history of federalism in this country, the book is a must read. The book can be enjoyed by both lawyers and lawmen. If you want to understand how and why the United States Supreme Court became involved in declaring state laws unconstitutional and the need for the Federal Courts to apply the United States Constitution to actions of local officials, this book will enable you to understand those reasons. A true story of unhearald courage by a very determined and brave attorney.

          5 out of 5 stars Excellent book.......2003-11-10

          I ended up reading this book in a little over two days. I was quickly hooked by the fascinating and horrifying story of Ed Johnson, an indigent black man, unjustly accused and convicted by an all-white judicial system that was very typical of the south at the turn of the century. Mr. Johnson's second set of lawyers, two courageous black lawyers, from Chattanooga appeal to the US Supreme Court and set the stage for the most intriguing case to ever be heard before the court. Read the book!

          5 out of 5 stars Scary moments of our past.......2003-03-10

          When Leroy Phillips, Jr. came to visit my school in Chattanooga, I was overwhelmed by the knowledge that something like this could have happened in my city. After his talk, I decided to read the book for myself. At first, I noticed that the authors took a lot of time to research the subject thoroughly, so much so that I think they know more about Chattanooga than I do, keeping in mind Leroy Phillips does live here. What also impressed me the most was the nonfiction story itself. The story is about a black man named Ed Johnson who was put on trial at first as a scapegoat. However, he eventually was a target for all anti-black aggressions. I mean, for me the 60's were scary, but the brutality and violence of the early 1900's, especially these incidents, are just terrifying. This book will show a detailed look at Chattanooga's past; it will show some historically fascinating law and court decisions, and it will just be an amazing read.

          5 out of 5 stars Powerful history of the Law and Racisim.......2003-02-19

          Black man accused of raping a white woman. Shakey identification. All white judge, jury, police, sheriff, and all lawyers on both sides. A death penalty case. A jury in the midst of trial jumps up and threatens to rip the defendant's heart out on the spot. He is found guilty. From date of crime to guilty verdict--one week. Defendant advised by his own lawyers after trial: you have two choices, waive appeal and let the State execute you, or appeal and let the mob lynch you.

          Then two Black lawyers take up the case. The Supreme Court is horrified at the gross miscarriage of justice, and issues a stay. But the mob, with the Sheriff's apparent approval, decides the legal process is just taking too long, and lynches the defendant.

          Contempt of Court tells this story in great detail, bringing all of the characters to life. A fascinating history of the role racism played in the courts at the turn of the century.

          But the heart of the book is what followed the lynching. Unlike most cases which were quickly forgotten, the Supreme Court itself instituted contempt charges against the Sheriff for failing to carry out its stay of execution. This is the one and only contempt proceeding ever tried in the Supreme Court itself. It also marked the first time the federal courts had ever sought to review a state court criminal proceeding--setting the stage for such well known rules as "Miranda" and the exclusionary rule.

          I completely agree with the blurb on the book's cover. This volume belongs on the shelf next to Simple Justice and Gideon's Trumpet.
          Federal Jurisdiction (Introduction to Law Series)
          Average customer rating: 5 out of 5 stars
          • essential resource
          • Every law student should have a copy.
          • An invaluable resource for Federal Courts
          • Nice reference tool
          • Helping you through Fed. Courts
          Federal Jurisdiction (Introduction to Law Series)
          Erwin Chemerinsky
          Manufacturer: Aspen Publishers
          ProductGroup: Book
          Binding: Paperback

          Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Subjects | Books
          GeneralGeneral | Law | Subjects | Books
          JurisprudenceJurisprudence | Perspectives on Law | Law | Subjects | Books
          Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
          GeneralGeneral | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
          Qualifying Textbooks - Spring 2007Qualifying Textbooks - Spring 2007 | Stores | Books
          Similar Items:
          1. Federal Courts (Gilbert Law Summaries)
          2. Hart and Wechsler's the Federal Courts and the Federal System (University Casebook Series)
          3. Federal Courts And The Law Of Federal-State Relations (University Casebook Series)
          4. Evidence Examples & Explanations, 6e (Examples & Explanations)
          5. Constitutional Law: Principles And Policies (Introduction to Law Series)

          ASIN: 0735527180

          Book Description

          Written by leading scholars, each title in the "Introduction to Law" series contains comprehensive treatment in black-letter style. Featuring footnotes citing to case law, statutory and other authorities, these volumes are ideal for in-depth research on particular issues and points of law.

          Customer Reviews:

          5 out of 5 stars essential resource.......2006-05-07

          If you plan on taking Federal Courts, get this book. Even if you are a genius or a masochist and would prefer to go hard-core and use only Hart and Wechsler, get this book anyway. Seriously, just get it. :-)

          5 out of 5 stars Every law student should have a copy........2005-02-27

          I'm a very average law student, and my federal courts class was stacked with the top 2nd and 3rd year students in my school. Despite this, I got the highest grade in the class. The reason...this book.

          Chemerinsky is able to take a complicated topic that takes 50 pages of a textbook to explain, and summarize it in a single paragraph.

          This single most impressive book I have encountered in 3 years of law school. And if you plan to practice in the federal court system, this book is essential. Buy it.

          5 out of 5 stars An invaluable resource for Federal Courts.......2004-06-28

          All of the thousands of law school study guides tout themselves as a means of breaking down the often complex material for students. Unfortunately, however, few are able to accomplish that goal, as the study guides themselves are often almost as large as the casebooks and do little to demystify law school courses. Chemerinsky's text is a refreshing change, as his Federal Jurisdiction hornbook helps you understand what is universally seen as the hardest course in law school, Federal Courts.

          Federal Courts is such a difficult class because of the sheer complexity of the material. Sadly, many students, me included, are forced to use Hart and Wechsler's Federal Courts casebook which is itself very difficult to learn from (for reasons I discuss in my review of that book). Many casebooks try to go over too much: they spend time on general principles, certainly, but often get caught up in discussing every single case with some relevance to the course, with less focus on hammering down an understanding of the general principles. Hart and Wechsler is a prime example of this. Their casebook is difficult to digest because there is so much to learn. Their endnotes are filled to the brim with hundreds of cases, many of which are unnecessary to obtain a general understanding of the course. And let's be honest, while these cases might be vital for aspiring future clerks taking Federal Courts, not all of us are clerking for the D.C. Circuit anytime soon.

          Chemerinsky's hornbook very adequately solves this problem. Of all of the study guides and hornbooks I have perused in law school, Chemerinsky's book helped guide me the most, in what is the hardest class I have taken. In well-defined sections, Chemerinsky breaks down the daunting Federal Courts in a manner that is easy to read and ultimately understand. Chemerinsky clearly as well as concisely lays out a framework for each of the key bedrock principles of Federal Courts and federal jurisdiction without getting caught up in going over every possible case with implications for federal courts. Chemerinsky does discuss the key exceptions as well as minor cases, but they flow very well with his general discussions of the base material of Federal Courts. His book, therefore, was extremely easy to absorb and helped me immensely in understanding Federal Courts.

          I was often bewildered and perplexed by the material discussed in Hart and Wechsler and in class lectures. Chemerinsky's book tore down much of my confusion by helping me focus on the key concepts of Federal Courts, and not getting lost in the forest of cases delineated by the casebook and by my professor. I strongly recommend that any student taking Federal Courts buy this book. It is invaluable to learning the course. You would be doing yourself a disservice if you did not take a look at Chemerinsky.

          5 out of 5 stars Nice reference tool.......2004-06-22

          As usual, Chemerinsky provides a clear and concise summary of this area of law. Practitioners and law students alike will find it to be a valuable reference tool. Like his treatise on Constitutional law, Chemerinsky has a unique ability to briefly encapsulate lengthy and sometimes conflicting Supreme Court precedent. I read it as a practitioner, but I'm sure law students will find it to be a helpful, though expensive supplement.

          The book does fail in maintaining any semblance of objectivity when it comes to the scope of federal judicial power. Although arguments are mechanically given for both sides of an issue, one gets the impression that Chemerinsky, in his weaker moments, would love to get rid of the 11th Amendment, standing requirements, amount in controversy requirements, and any other obstacle to a federal court's ability to hear a case.

          5 out of 5 stars Helping you through Fed. Courts.......2002-11-02

          This book was a great help to me getting through Federal Courts in addition to my textbook. As any law student can tell you, Federal Courts or Federal Jurisdiction probably outranks civil procedure as the most dreaded class at law school. I am a firm believer in the importance of the subject and this book was invaluable to me in class and in work. If you have a legal problem that will involve federal litigation, this book is a must have. It makes a subject that I often believe is as clear as reading tea leaves a little easier.
          Federal Rules of Civil Procedure  2004: with Selected Statutes (Statutory and Case Supplement)
          Average customer rating: 1 out of 5 stars
          • I NEVER GOT MY BOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
          Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 2004: with Selected Statutes (Statutory and Case Supplement)
          Stephen C. Yeazell
          Manufacturer: Aspen Publishers
          ProductGroup: Book
          Binding: Paperback

          Civil ProcedureCivil Procedure | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Subjects | Books
          CourtsCourts | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Subjects | Books
          Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Subjects | Books
          GeneralGeneral | Law | Subjects | Books
          Federal JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction | Administrative Law | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
          Civil ProcedureCivil Procedure | Procedures & Litigation | Law | Professional & Technical | Subjects | Books
          Similar Items:
          1. Civil Procedure (Casebook Series)
          2. Property
          3. Civil Procedure: Examples & Explanations 5th edition
          4. Civil Procedure: A Modern Approach (American Casebook)
          5. The Buffalo Creek Disaster: How the survivors of one of the worst disasters in coal-mining history brought suit against the coal company--and won

          ASIN: 0735540950

          Customer Reviews:

          1 out of 5 stars I NEVER GOT MY BOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.......2005-08-31

          I am really mad bc I never got this book! As of 3 weeks after I oredered it, it had not been shipped! I had to cancell my order!

          Law Books:

          1. Federal Tax Law
          2. Gender And The Law
          3. Government Law
          4. Health Care Law
          5. Housing Development
          6. Human Rights Law
          7. Immigration Law
          8. Insurance Law
          9. Intellectual Property
          10. International Law

          Law Books

          Law Books